Well, there were quite a few areas left for improvement after the pre-assessment.
I failed misrably in route summarization for all routing protocols :)
So, I figured since that stuck out so badly, I should focus on it.
So today I turned on GNS3, and played with it. On Router 5 (R5) I created 4 networks using loopback addresses.
20.20.1.1 /24
20.20.2.1/24
20.20.4.1/24
20.20.8.1/24
Advertised these networks into OSPF
router ospf 1
network 20.20.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 1
network 20.20.2.0 0.0.0.255 area 1
network 20.20.4.0 0.0.0.255 area 1
network 20.20.8.0 0.0.0.255 area 1
Now the fun part. I thought ok, time to summarize, do the math:
as the 3rd octet is the focus, I just did the math there.
20.20.1.1 00000001
20.20.1.2 00000010
20.20.1.4 00000100
20.20.1.8 00001000
as we are already using 16 bits, (20.20.x.x) we count the remaining like bits to determine the mask to use for the summary. So we see we can use 4 bits, as the 5th bit in this octet changed. This leaves us with a 255.255.240.0 or / 20 Mask (16 bits used for the 20.20 part of the network + 4 bits in our 3rd octet)
So the summary would be 20.20.0.0 /20.
Next I applied the command using the summary-address command under the RIP process. THis did not work, But I was like how , I just did the same test in RIP.
A good friend reminded me summary-address is used for sending to an external AS.
SO i changed the to use the area range command.
Router ospf 1
area 1 range 20.20.0.0 255.255.240.0
Ah.. yes it worked. I apologize for not providing the working output, I closed GNS3 to quickly.
What I did find was interesting. When testing show ip route for my subnets, I found this summary also encompassed networks , that I am not currently using. I did show ip route 20.20.9.0 all the way up to 20.20.15.0 and my summary worked for these addresses even though I was not using them. Interesting huh?
Ok So i was thinking how is this happening? In reading more on this, you can summarize any address as long as ONE of the addresses is in the current routing table. Ah! ok. but why did the summary work for all of my addresses up to non-existing address fo 20.20.15.0, but not work for 20.20.16.x ?
Still Was not sure until I looked at the binary.
20.20.1.1 00000001
20.20.1.2 00000010
20.20.1.4 00000100
20.20.1.8 00001000
It only summarized up to 16 because of the subnet Mask boundary defined in by my mask
The 1st 4 bits, help define our mask, leaving our remaing 4 to be covered in the summary. If you add 1111(15) it equals to 15, hence not being able to encompass subnet 20.20.16.0 in the summary as its across the bit boundary by one bit as I defined in my mask.
Monday, January 30, 2012
Friday, January 27, 2012
Let's try this again
January 2012, really? I thoughd I'd be done with getting my CCIE by now, but as everyone knows, life never goes as we brilliantly planned :)
Alot has changed in the last two years. I am now working at Cisco in TAC and have had enjoyed the experience. I have the ability to work on so many different platforms and learn so much. My primary area of focus at work though is LAN switching so I like to think that helps me in my preperation for the CCIE R&S Lab exam.
I have recently been approved by my manager to attend an internal CCIE 360 program. It is not a 100 % instructlor led class, in fact I here its not very often is there ILT. So I will get as much as I put into the program. I intend to immerse myself in this opportunity that is coming free of costs , thanks Cisco.
To brush up on my rusty CCIE level lab skills, I decided last night to rent some time on Internetwork expert's rack rental. I opted to work on Volume 3 Core lab 3, which is essentially everything L2 including (STP, VTP, VLAN, Frame-relay,) L3(RIPv2, EIGRP,OSPF, BGP) and then the dreaded Route redistribution. Yes, that's right, I admit where I suck... lol.. and right now that is route redistribution. I did everything just fine up to this point, and on the last task It killed me. I realized this morning, I forgot one command that would have made last night a total succcess. Oh well, It was still a success considering the learning experience I can take from it.
Tomorrow night I have my first CCIE 360 pre-assessment lab. This will include everything I did on the INE lab, but also include IPv6, QoS, and Security. I hope after removing the dust off my brain last night that this goes smooth. This is not a pass/fail, its more to see what areas I am strong in, and some areas that can use some improvement which I'm sure are many.
Alot has changed in the last two years. I am now working at Cisco in TAC and have had enjoyed the experience. I have the ability to work on so many different platforms and learn so much. My primary area of focus at work though is LAN switching so I like to think that helps me in my preperation for the CCIE R&S Lab exam.
I have recently been approved by my manager to attend an internal CCIE 360 program. It is not a 100 % instructlor led class, in fact I here its not very often is there ILT. So I will get as much as I put into the program. I intend to immerse myself in this opportunity that is coming free of costs , thanks Cisco.
To brush up on my rusty CCIE level lab skills, I decided last night to rent some time on Internetwork expert's rack rental. I opted to work on Volume 3 Core lab 3, which is essentially everything L2 including (STP, VTP, VLAN, Frame-relay,) L3(RIPv2, EIGRP,OSPF, BGP) and then the dreaded Route redistribution. Yes, that's right, I admit where I suck... lol.. and right now that is route redistribution. I did everything just fine up to this point, and on the last task It killed me. I realized this morning, I forgot one command that would have made last night a total succcess. Oh well, It was still a success considering the learning experience I can take from it.
Tomorrow night I have my first CCIE 360 pre-assessment lab. This will include everything I did on the INE lab, but also include IPv6, QoS, and Security. I hope after removing the dust off my brain last night that this goes smooth. This is not a pass/fail, its more to see what areas I am strong in, and some areas that can use some improvement which I'm sure are many.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)